Flight simulators: FTD, external FFS, or internal FFS?
In the highly demanding aviation sector, selecting the right simulator is a critical decision for training centers, aviation schools, fleet operators, and aircraft manufacturers. Each faces specific challenges, ranging from resource optimization to regulatory compliance and high-quality training. This article addresses the most common concerns across these sectors, providing strategies and practical recommendations tailored to professional needs.
How to choose the ideal flight simulator for your training center?
Choosing between a Flight Training Device (FTD), an external Full Flight Simulator (FFS), or an internal FFS requires analyzing multiple factors. From costs to availability and regulations, each decision must align with your organization’s operational and financial objectives. Below, we outline the key points to consider:
1. Simulator availability and regulations
One of the main concerns for training centers is the availability of high-level simulators, such as Full Flight Simulator Level D, particularly for helicopters. Currently, there are very few helicopter FFSs globally, requiring bookings as far as six months to a year in advance. This presents a significant challenge, especially for meeting the annual proficiency checks required to maintain pilot licenses.
In this context, Flight Training Devices have emerged as an effective alternative, specifically designed to reduce dependence on FFSs. While FTDs serve as an intermediate option between FNPTs and FFSs, their regulation poses challenges. According to OSDs (Operational Suitability Data) issued by aircraft manufacturers, many FTD Level 3 devices can be considered equivalent to FFSs for much of the training process. For instance, for certain helicopter models, an FFS Level D can functionally be replaced by a configuration combining an FFS Level B and an Flight Training Device Level 3, as offered by Entrol.
However, regulations stipulate that FTDs can only be used if FFSs are not “available or accessible.” This interpretation varies among Civil Aviation Authorities (CAAs) in different countries, making it essential to confirm with your local authority whether using an FTD complies with regulatory requirements.
2. How to optimize your budget when choosing between FTDs and FFSs?
Budget is one of the most decisive factors when selecting a simulator. Acquisition costs vary significantly:
- FFS Level D: Between 12 and 15 million euros.
- FFS Level B: Between 5 and 8 million euros.
- FTD Level 3: Between 2 and 4 million euros.
The prices listed below depend on various factors, including the model, equipment, and additional features included.
Flight Training Devices offer a cost-effective solution for many organizations that cannot afford the investment in an FFS Level D. Additionally, as previously mentioned, combining an FFS Level B with an FTD Level 3 can meet most training requirements at a fraction of the cost. This is particularly advantageous for centers with limited budgets or those looking to optimize cost-benefit ratios.
3. What are the differences between external and internal FFSs?
Choosing between an external or internal FFS depends on the operational capacity and strategic needs of each training center or organization. Below are the main differences:
- External Full Flight Simulator:
- Advantages: Ideal for centers that lack the financial or technical capacity to operate an internal FFS. It allows access to the most advanced technology without requiring a substantial initial investment. External FFSs are typically managed by specialized operators, ensuring optimal maintenance and availability.
- Disadvantages: Availability can be an issue, particularly for helicopter simulators. Long wait times and recurring rental costs can add up quickly. Additionally, it involves greater dependence on third parties.
- Advantages: Ideal for centers that lack the financial or technical capacity to operate an internal FFS. It allows access to the most advanced technology without requiring a substantial initial investment. External FFSs are typically managed by specialized operators, ensuring optimal maintenance and availability.
- Internal Full Flight Simulator:
- Advantages: Offers complete autonomy and control over training planning and execution. Over the long term, it can be more cost-effective, especially for centers with high training volumes. Furthermore, it enables full customization of training scenarios to meet specific fleet needs.
- Disadvantages: The initial investment is significantly high, with acquisition costs ranging from 12 to 15 million euros for an FFS Level D. Additionally, maintenance and operations require significant technical resources and specialized personnel.
- Advantages: Offers complete autonomy and control over training planning and execution. Over the long term, it can be more cost-effective, especially for centers with high training volumes. Furthermore, it enables full customization of training scenarios to meet specific fleet needs.
In summary, an external FFS is suitable for centers needing flexibility and occasional access, while an internal Full Flight Simulator is ideal for operations with high demands for recurrent training and advanced certifications
Effective strategies to maximize your flight simulator performance
Designing an effective training strategy involves combining technologies and solutions tailored to your organization’s specific needs. Key recommendations include:
- Investing in Internal FTDs: To reduce dependence on external FFSs and ensure availability for recurrent checks.
- Adopting a Hybrid Model: Combining FTDs and FFSs Level B as an alternative to FFSs Level D, achieving a balance between cost and performance.
- Exploring Collaborative Agreements: Sharing resources with other centers to optimize costs and improve access to high-level simulators.
Key factors to consider when choosing between FTDs and FFSs
Before deciding which simulator to acquire or implement, it’s important to reflect on the following aspects:
- What is the annual training hour requirement?
- What certification level is required by local and international regulations?
- Does your budget allow for internal simulators, or do you rely on external options?
- What are the regulatory limitations and possibilities set by your CAA?
- Is there a need to customize training to suit the specific characteristics of your fleet?
Find the perfect balance between Flight Training Devices and Full Flight Simulators for your center
The choice between an FTD, an external Full Flight Simulator, or an internal Full Flight Simulator not only impacts training quality but also the operational efficiency and long-term profitability of your organization. Whether you are a training center seeking to optimize your programs, an aviation school aiming to offer the best learning experience to your students, or an operator requiring tailored solutions for your fleet, Entrol has the answer.
Entrol designs state-of-the-art simulators, adhering to the highest standards of quality and compliance. With a wide range of devices, from FTDs to FFSs Level B, we provide solutions tailored to the needs of training centers, schools, and operators worldwide. Our team of experts is available to guide and support you in selecting the technology best suited to your operational and financial goals.
Explore our options for Full Flight Simulators and Flight Training Devices, and discover how we can enhance your training programs with cutting-edge technology and personalized expertise.
